Bio-H App

Acasă » Acasă » Referinţe bibliografice

Referinţe bibliografice

Reclame
  1. Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, et al: Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 384:980-1004, 2014
  2. Eniu A: Cancer In Romania, American Society of Clinical Oncology News & Forum, www.asconews.org/anf/ Cancer+in+Romania 2010
  3. IOCN: Ion Chiricuta Oncology Institute. Report in facts and figures: 2009-2013. Cluj, IOCN, 2013
  4. Gong Y: Breast Cancer: Pathology, Cytology, and Core Needle Biopsy Methods for Diagnosis. New York, Springer Science, 2013
  5. Swan JS, Lawrence WF, Roy J: Process utility in breast biopsy. Med Decis Making 26:347-59, 2006
  6. Soo AE, Shelby RA, Miller LS, et al: Predictors of pain experienced by women during percutaneous imaging-guided breast biopsies. J Am Coll Radiol 11:709-16, 2014
  7. Verkooijen HM, Buskens E, Peeters PH, et al: Diagnosing non-palpable breast disease: short-term impact on quality of life of large-core needle biopsy versus open breast biopsy. Surg Oncol 10:177-81, 2002
  8. Humphrey KL, Lee JM, Donelan K, et al: Percutaneous breast biopsy: effect on short-term quality of life. Radiology 270:362-8, 2014
  9. Miller LS, Shelby RA, Balmadrid MH, et al: Patient Anxiety Before and Immediately After Imaging-Guided Breast Biopsy Procedures: Impact of Radiologist-Patient Communication. Journal of the American College of Radiology 10:423-431, 2013
  10. CD Spielberger RG, PR Lushene, PR Vagg, AG Jacobs Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y. Palo Alto, Consulting Psychology Press, 1983
  11. Maxwell JR, Bugbee ME, Wellisch D, et al: Imaging-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of the Breast: Study of Psychological Outcomes. Breast J 6:53-61, 2000
  12. Hughson AV, Cooper AF, McArdle CS, et al: Psychosocial morbidity in patients awaiting breast biopsy. J Psychosom Res 32:173-80, 1988
  13. van Vlymen JM, Rego MMS, White PF: Benzodiazepine premedication – Can it improve outcome in patients undergoing breast biopsy procedures? Anesthesiology 90:740-747, 1999
  14. Bugbee ME, Wellisch DK, Arnott IM, et al: Breast core-needle biopsy: Clinical trial of relaxation technique versus medication versus no intervention for anxiety reduction. Radiology 234:73-78, 2005
  15. Lang EV, Berbaum KS, Faintuch S, et al: Adjunctive self-hypnotic relaxation for outpatient medical procedures: a prospective randomized trial with women undergoing large core breast biopsy. Pain 126:155-64, 2006
  16. Montgomery GH, Schnur JB, Kravits K: Hypnosis for cancer care: over 200 years young. CA Cancer J Clin 63:31-44, 2013
  17. Montgomery GH, David D, Kangas M, et al: Randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioral therapy plus hypnosis intervention to control fatigue in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:557-63, 2014
  18. Montgomery GH, Bovbjerg DH, Schnur JB, et al: A randomized clinical trial of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1304-12, 2007
  19. Kekecs Z, Nagy T, Varga K: The effectiveness of suggestive techniques in reducing postoperative side effects: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 119:1407-19, 2014
  20. Flammer E, Alladin A: The efficacy of hypnotherapy in the treatment of psychosomatic disorders: meta-analytical evidence. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 55:251-74, 2007
  21. Montgomery GH, Schnur JB, David D: The impact of hypnotic suggestibility in clinical care settings. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 59:294-309, 2011
  22. Richardson J, Smith JE, McCall G, et al: Hypnosis for nausea and vomiting in cancer chemotherapy: a systematic review of the research evidence. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 16:402-12, 2007
  23. Liossi C, Hatira P: Clinical hypnosis in the alleviation of procedure-related pain in pediatric oncology patients. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 51:4-28, 2003
  24. Liossi C, White P, Hatira P: A randomized clinical trial of a brief hypnosis intervention to control venepuncture-related pain of paediatric cancer patients. Pain 142:255-63, 2009
  25. Stalpers LJ, da Costa HC, Merbis MA, et al: Hypnotherapy in radiotherapy patients: a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:499-506, 2005
  26. Montgomery GH, David D, Winkel G, et al: The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 94:1639-45, table of contents, 2002
  27. Yates JS, Mustian KM, Morrow GR, et al: Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer patients during treatment. Support Care Cancer 13:806-11, 2005
  28. Rees RW, Feigel I, Vickers A, et al: Prevalence of complementary therapy use by women with breast cancer. A population-based survey. Eur J Cancer 36:1359-64, 2000
  29. Maskarinec G, Shumay DM, Kakai H, et al: Ethnic differences in complementary and alternative medicine use among cancer patients. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 6:531-538, 2000
  30. Lau R, Stevenson F, Ong BN, et al: Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol. BMJ Open 4:e005548, 2014
  31. West JH, Hall PC, Hanson CL, et al: There’s an App for That: Content Analysis of Paid Health and Fitness Apps. Journal of Medical Internet Research 14:184-195, 2012
  32. Sucala M, Schnur JB, Glazier K, et al: Hypnosis–there’s an app for that: a systematic review of hypnosis apps. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 61:463-74, 2013
  33. Moore S, Jayewardene D: The use of smartphones in clinical practice. Nurs Manag (Harrow) 21:18-22, 2014
  34. A sampling of health and medical apps. J Mich Dent Assoc 93:28, 2011
  35. Company G-GcWd: Smartphone Users Around the World – Statistics and Facts Infographic. http://www.go-gulf.com/blog/smartphone/, 2014
  36. GFK: Internet use in Romania. http://www.gfk-ro.com/, 2012
  37. Gaggioli A, Cipresso P, Serino S, et al: Positive technology: a free mobile platform for the self-management of psychological stress. Stud Health Technol Inform 199:25-9, 2014
  38. Persons JB, Silberschatz G: Are results of randomized controlled trials useful to psychotherapists? J Consult Clin Psychol 66:126-35, 1998
  39. Gottdiener WH: Improving the relationship between the randomized clinical trial and real-world clinical practice. Psychotherapy (Chic) 48:231-3; discussion 234-6, 2011
  40. Price DD, Fillingim RB, Robinson ME: Placebo analgesia: friend or foe? Curr Rheumatol Rep 8:418-24, 2006
  41. Montgomery GH, Hallquist MN, Schnur JB, et al: Mediators of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients: response expectancies and emotional distress. J Consult Clin Psychol 78:80-8, 2010
  42. Kirsch I: Response Expectancy as a Determinant of Experience and Behavior. American Psychologist 40:1189-1202, 1985
  43. Lynn SJ, Rhue JW, Kirsch I: Handbook of clinical hypnosis (ed 2nd). Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 2010
  44. Bowers KS: The Relevance of Hypnosis for Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. Clinical Psychology Review 2:67-78, 1982
  45. David D, Lynn SJ, Ellis A: Rational and irrational beliefs : research, theory, and clinical practice. New York, Oxford University Press, 2010
  46. Goldfried MR, Wolfe BE: Psychotherapy practice and research. Repairing a strained alliance. Am Psychol 51:1007-16, 1996
  47. Milling LS: The Spanos Attitudes Toward Hypnosis Questionnaire: psychometric characteristics and normative data. Am J Clin Hypn 54:202-12, 2012
  48. Wilkie D, Lovejoy N, Dodd M, et al: Cancer pain intensity measurement: concurrent validity of three tools–finger dynamometer, pain intensity number scale, visual analogue scale. Hosp J 6:1-13, 1990
  49. Mendoza T, Mayne T, Rublee D, et al: Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis. Eur J Pain 10:353-61, 2006
  50. Baker F, Denniston M, Zabora J, et al: A POMS short form for cancer patients: psychometric and structural evaluation. Psychooncology 11:273-81, 2002

 

Reclame
De în Acasă pe .

Lasă un răspuns

Completează mai jos detaliile tale sau dă clic pe un icon pentru a te autentifica:

Gravatar
Logo WordPress.com

Comentezi folosind contul tău WordPress.com. ( Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Fotografie Google

Comentezi folosind contul tău Google. ( Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Poză Twitter

Comentezi folosind contul tău Twitter. ( Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Fotografie Facebook

Comentezi folosind contul tău Facebook. ( Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Anulează

Conectare la %s

Link-uri utile

http://www.ubbcluj.ro/ro/ http://clinicalpsychology.psiedu.ubbcluj.ro/ http://psychotherapy.psiedu.ubbcluj.ro/

Acknowledgement

Proiectul Studiu clinic controlat pentru investigarea eficientei unei aplicatii smartphone pentru managementul simptomelor biopsiei mamare: Bio h-app având codul PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-0490 este finanţat de către Unitatea Executivă pentru Finanţarea Învăţământului Superior, a Cercetării, Dezvoltării şi Inovării (UEFISCDI).
%d blogeri au apreciat asta: